Hindu–Islamic relations

From Salaafipedia

<templatestyles src="Hlist/styles.css"></templatestyles><templatestyles src="Module:Sidebar/styles.css"></templatestyles>

<templatestyles src="Hlist/styles.css"></templatestyles><templatestyles src="Module:Sidebar/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Interactions between Muslims and Hindus began in the 7th century, after the advent of the former in the Arabian Peninsula. These interactions were mainly by trade throughout the Indian Ocean. Historically, these interactions formed contrasting patterns in northern and southern India. While there is a history of conquest and domination in the north, Hindu-Muslim relations in Kerala and Tamil Nadu have been peaceful.[1] However, historical evidence has shown that violence had existed by the year 1700 A.D.[2]

In the 16th century, the Mughal Empire was established. Under the Mughals, India experienced a period of relative stability and prosperity.[3] The Mughals were known for their religious tolerance, and they actively patronized the arts and literature. During the Mughal era, Indian art and culture thrived, with the construction of grand monuments such as the Taj Mahal and the Red Fort. While the Mughals fostered religious harmony and cultural advancements and nurtured Hindu scholars, poets, and artists, facilitating a dynamic cultural interchange that enriched both Islamic and Hindu traditions, there were instances of religious conflicts between the Mughals and the Rajput over control of territories. Aurangzeb was criticized for his policies of religious intolerance towards Hindus.[4][5]

During the 17th to 20th centuries, India was ruled by the British, who introduced a policy of divide and rule to maintain their control over the country.[6][7][8] The British also introduced a system of separate electorates, which further exacerbated the divide between the Hindu and Muslim communities.[9][10] The Indian Rebellion of 1857, also known as the First War of Independence, was a major uprising against British rule in India. The rebellion was fueled by a range of grievances, including economic exploitation, social and religious discrimination, and political oppression.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Footnotes".[11] While the rebellion was not solely based on religious tensions between Hindus and Muslims, these tensions did play a role in fueling the conflict. During the rebellion, there were instances of both Muslim and Hindu soldiers and civilians fighting together against the British, as well as instances of conflict between the two communities.[12][13][14]

Islam and Hinduism share some ritual practices, such as fasting and pilgrimage, but their views differ on various aspects. There are also hundreds of shared ritual spaces, called dargahs (literally, “doorway” or “threshold”), for Hindus and Muslims. These mark shrines for revered Muslim (frequently Sufi) leaders and are visited by both Muslims and Hindus. Their interaction has witnessed periods of cooperation and syncretism, and periods of religious discrimination, intolerance, and violence. As a religious minority in India, Muslims are part of the Indian culture and have lived with Hindus for over 13 centuries. Despite the longtime assertion that the origins of Muslim-Hindu tensions were greatly attributed to 19th Century British colonial rule in India, it has been argued that Britain had little influence on constructing the religious identities of Islam and Hinduism in the region and that divisions existed beforehand as well.[15] For example, 18th-century Mughal–Maratha Wars. Ajay Verghese argues that the Hindu-Muslim conflict in India can be better understood by analyzing the historical relationship between the two communities. He contends that precolonial India was marked by a fluidity of religious identity and that religious boundaries were not always clear-cut. This led to a degree of intermingling between Muslims and Hindus, but also created conditions for tension and conflict.[2]

Theology[edit | edit source]

Islam is a monotheistic religion in which God is called Allah, and the final Islamic prophet is Muhammad, whom Muslims believe delivered the central Islamic scripture, the Qurān.[16] Muslims believe that Islam is the complete and universal faith of a primordial faith that was revealed many times through earlier prophets such as Adam (believed to be the first man), Abraham, Moses, and Jesus, among others; these earlier revelations are attributed to Judaism and Christianity, which are regarded in Islam as spiritual predecessor faiths.[17][18] The Quran and the Ḥadīth literature are the primary Islamic scriptures, while the sunnah consists of the Islamic traditional customs and practices which all Muslims are expected to follow. Throughout its rich history, Islamic civilization has made notable scientific achievements which encompassed a wide range of subject areas especially medicine, mathematics, astronomy, agriculture as well as physics, economics, engineering and optics.[19][20][21] The consequence of Islam's rigorous monotheism led to a degree of panentheism, sharing similarities with the Hindu idea of the Absolute (Brahman).[22] The Islamic mystical tradition predates contact with Hinduism, and Hinduistic monotheistic interpretations seem to be influenced by Islamic Sufism.[22] The concept of Brahman was rarely subject of criticism from the perceptive of Islamic tawhid, rather the Hindu belief that prophecy wouldn't be necessary to guide mankind.[23]

Hinduism, also called sanatana dharma (eternal dharma), is an Indian religion and a way of life primarily practiced in the Indian subcontinent.[24] Hinduism mostly shares common terms with the dhārmic religions that it influenced, including Buddhism, Sikhism, and Jainism.[25] The central scriptures of Hinduism are the Shruti and Smruti texts. Shruti texts consist of the four Vedas (which comprise the original Vedic hymns, or Samhitas) and three tiers of commentaries upon the samhitas, namely the Brāhmaṇas, Āraṇyakas, and Upanishads.[26] These texts are considered to be authentic knowledge and wisdom of the past, collated, compiled, and codified into written form for future generations. Smruti texts includes the Rāmāyana, Mahābhārata, Bhagavad Gītā, and Purānas, which are also considered to be sacred Hindu texts.

Comparisons[edit | edit source]

God and deities[edit | edit source]

Template:Main

God[edit | edit source]

Hinduism is a system of thought in which the concept of God varies according to its diverse traditions.[27][28][29][30] Hinduism spans a wide range of beliefs such as henotheism, monotheism, polytheism, panentheism, pantheism, pandeism, monism, atheism and nontheism.[27][28][31][32] One popular theological interpretation is the Advaita Vedanta tradition, which relies mainly on the Upanishads and declares absolute monism, exemplified in the concept of Brahman (the ultimate reality).[33][34] When a person is devoid of ignorance (Avidyā), they find the truth by realizing that their true nature, pure soul, or inner Self (Ātman) is identical to Brahman.[35] Until then, they are usually ignorant of the ultimate reality and therefore believe that the material world around them is real and indulges in it, when the world is actually an illusion (Māyā).[35] The Brahman, which is absolute and pure, and the Ātman, which is also absolute and pure, are the same in this school of Hindu thought, which exemplifies the Hindu concept of God.[33][35]

Islam is a system of thought that believes in the concept of the unity and uniqueness of God (Tawḥīd), which declares monotheism, and is considered to be the defining doctrine of the Islamic religion.[36] God in Islam is conceived as the absolute one, the all-powerful and all-knowing ruler of the universe, and the creator of everything in existence.[16][37][38] According to Islam, God is transcendent and is not part of the universe (i.e. there is no incarnation of God, no "Son of God", etc.) but a power behind all aspects of the universe.[39] Thus, Muslims do not attribute human forms to God. God is described and referred to by several names or attributes.[40] One of the five pillars of Islam is that Muslims affirm the Shahada in the five canonical daily prayers, which declares that "There is no other god but Allah, and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah."[41][42]

Despite the obvious discrepancy between Islamic monotheism and Hindu polytheism, some Muslim authors showed approval of the Hindu religion, especially the due to the concept of Brahman. Sometimes, Brahmans were even excepted from the Jizya (taxes for non-Muslims).[43][44] Gardizi identifies the God of the Brahmans with Allah.[45]

Ibn al-Jawzi (1116 – 1201) criticizes in his Talbīs Iblīs (the deception of Satan) that the Brahmans are led astray by means of denying the prophets and their performance of self-harming rituals to get closer to God, but not by their lack of "monotheism".[46]

Al-Biruni famously recorded the beliefs of Hindus in a descriptive manner. He notes that although the common people would worship idols, the educated people would be "entirely free from worshipping anything but God alone and would never dream of worshipping an image manufactured to represent him." He does not blame idolatry on Hinduism, but to a lack of proper education. The difference between monotheistic religions and Hinduism would not be that strong, since all uneducated people, even among Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, would need concrete objects to worship.[45]

Amir Khusrau (1253 – 1325) writes that Hindus have gone astray, but so have other religions and Hinduism would still consist of beliefs shared by Muslims: They would believe in the oneness and eternity of God as creator and sustainer. For that reason, he favors Hinduism before materialists (dahriyya), dualists (thanawiyya), Christianity who attribute to God spirit and progeny, and the star-worshippers (akhtariyyan) who acknowledge seven deities. The Hindu (precisely Brahmanist) would worship animals, stones, and the sun, but the Brahmanist accepts that they do not really bear likeness to God and are God's creation, they are only worshipped due to tradition.[45]

Although there are a number of diverse conceptions of God and deities within Hinduism, most fuqaha (Muslim jurists), such as Muslim heresiographer al-Shahrastani, consider all of them to be polytheistic and blasphemous. Opposition towards Brahmanism stems from the polytheistic teachings within Hindu-culture. The Brahmans would have taught to the people not that the idols are symbols of God, but deities themselves.[47] Nonetheless, most scholars agree that Hindus should be considered dhimmi.[45]

Deities[edit | edit source]

Divine spirits in Hindu-lore were integrated into the monotheistic Islamic worldview by Muslim authors writing about Hinduism. They acknowledged that these spirits would exude a mesmerizing fascination on people, even Muslims couldn't withstand. Arab Muslim geographer al-Maqdisī (Template:Circa CE) wrote about Indian deities, that they have the power to enchant people, even Muslims, to worship them. A Muslim is said to have visited them and abandoned Islam. Besides their power to distract even Muslims from worshiping Allah, they may have real magical powers and even grant their worshippers wishes.[48]

In al-Tabasi's (d. 1089) compendium about magic and sorcery Mahakal, an epithet for the Hindu deity Shiva, is mentioned. Abu Sa'id al Gardizi (fl. 1049) further elaborates that this deva (dīv) would have the power to teach incantations ('aza'im) and how to perform wonders ('aja'ib).[49]

To harmonize the existence of such spirits with the monotheistic worldview of Islam, it was assumed that the Indian deities were created by Allah, however, prior to the beings revealed in the Quran. Abu Ali Bal'ami (d. 992–997) asserts that the deva (div) were created long before the angels and jinn.[50]Template:Rp Unlike jinn, the div would have refused to obey the Prophet Solomon.[51]

In the Nabivamsa, by Syed Sultan, identifies the suras and asura with jinn and jann respectively. The Hindu spirits are supposed to be created over 4 million years ago, while angels (phiristā) settle on earth afterwards. Since the different beings are constantly at war, Niranjan sents the Vedas to the Asuras and Devas, but eventually decides to command the angels to get rid of them. Afterwards, God creates the progenitor of humankind Adam. This story reflects early hadith material regarding the life of jinn before Adam was created. According to Islamic sources, God let the jinn live on earth and sent angels under the leadership of Azazil as authority over them. Later, God decides to replace them by humankind.[52]

Scriptures and messengers[edit | edit source]

The sacred scriptures of Islam are the Qurān and the Ḥadīths, which report what Muhammad said and did. Ḥadīths are varied and have many versions. According to Islamic doctrine, Jesus Christ was also one of the messengers from God.[53] Muslims believe that Muhammad was the last messenger and the Qurān was the last revelation from God, delivered to him through the angel Jibrīl.[54] The Ḥadīths contain the sunnah, the reports of Muhammad's life, sayings, actions, and examples he set. The Qurān and the reliable Ḥadīths are considered in Islam as the sources of Islamic law or Sharīʿah.[55]

Unlike Islam, Hinduism doesn't have centralized religious authorities, or governing bodies. It has some defining historical and religious texts, the sacred Hindu scriptures, traditional ecclesiastical order, incarnations, and the legal code Manusmṛti.[56][57] Spiritual knowledge of Hinduism is contained in texts called Śruti ("what is heard") and Smṛti ("what is remembered"). These sacred texts discuss diverse topics, including theology, cosmology, mythology, philosophy, rituals and rites of passage, and many others. Major scriptures in Hinduism include the Vedas and Upanishads (both Śruti), the Epics (Rāmāyana and Mahābhārata), Purāṇas, Dharmaśāstras, Āgamas, and the Bhagavad Gītā (all Smṛti).[58][59]

According to Muslim scholars, Brahmans reject that God would send messengers. The Brahmans argue, if God wanted humans to understand his will, he would have created mankind accordingly. Thus, they assert, that human reason is sufficient to understand God's will.[23] Muslim scholars on the other hand assert, that prophecy is necessary for mankind in religious matters. Asharites argue that justification of morality relies on revelation. In contrast, Maturidites assert morality can be detected by reason, but mankind requires prophecy for supernatural matters.[60]

Similarities[edit | edit source]

Template:See also

According to Islam, after death, one either enters Paradise (Jannah) or Hell (Jahannam), depending on their deeds. Unlike Muslims, Hindus believe in a cycle of reincarnation.[61] However, the concept of higher and lower realms of existence can be found in Hinduism, though the realms are temporary places.[62]

Both Muslims and Hindus acknowledge demons (Shaitan/Asura), who are constantly inciting war between the desires of humans and the Divine.Template:Clarify[63] Asuras are part of Hindu mythology along with Devas, Yakshas and Rakshasas, and are featured in one of many cosmological theories in Hinduism.[64][65] Asuras are sometimes considered nature spirits. They constantly battle with the devas.[66]

Both believe in the existence of an entirety Supreme Power, either called Brahman or Allah. Brahman is a metaphysical concept that is the single binding unity behind the diversity in all that exists in the universe.[67]Script error: No such module "Footnotes". Allah is the Arabic word for God in Abrahamic religions. Assimilated in local lore, the Islamic concept of God became comparable to the notion of the ultimate reality expressing itself through different names as the creator, the maintainer, and the destroyer.[68] Some Islamic scholars believe that the worlds created by God will perish and be created anew, resembling the Hindu notion of an endless process of generation and decay.[69][70]

Pilgrimage is found in both religions: Hajj & Umrah to Mecca in Islam and Kumbh Mela and Tirtha Yatra in Hinduism.[71] Muslims walk seven times around the Kaaba during Hajj, which is called Tawaf.[72] Hindus walk one or more times around the center (Garbhagriya) of a temple (one to twenty-one),[73][74][75][76] called Parikrama (known in Sanskrit as pradakśiṇā). Both of them are commonly called circumambulation.[77][78]

According to some members of the Ahmadiya Muslim Community (Abdul Haq Vidyarthi), The Islamic prophet Muhammad is believed to be the Hindu Avatar Kalki. Some Muslim scholars and a few Hindu scholars like Ved Prakash Upaddhay[79][80] also argue that mentions of Kalki refer to Muhammad in some Hindu scriptures.[80][81] Sri Sri Ravi Shankar claimed in his book "Hinduism and Islam: The Common Thread" that Muhammad is explicitly prophesied in Bhavishya Purana.[82][83]

Sufism[edit | edit source]

Template:Main Template:See also The 10th-century Persian polymath Al-Biruni in his book Tahaqeeq Ma Lilhind Min Makulat Makulat Fi Aliaqbal Am Marzula (Critical Study of Indian Speech: Rationally Acceptable or Rejected) discusses the similarity of some Sufism concepts with aspects of Hinduism, such as: Atman with ruh, tanasukh with reincarnation, Moksha with Fanaa, Ittihad with Nirvana: union between Paramatman in Jivatma, Avatar or Incarnation with Hulul, Vedanta with Wahdat al-Wujud, Mujahadah with Sadhana.Template:Citation needed

Other scholars have likewise compared the Sufi concept of Waḥdat al-Wujūd with Advaita Vedanta,[84] Fanaa to Samadhi,[70] Muraqaba to Dhyana and tariqa to the Noble Eightfold Path.[85]

Sufi theologian Martin Lings says, Template:Blockquote

Al-Biruni observed in his history of India that the fundamental ideas behind metempsychosis or reincarnation in Hinduism are not very different from the concept of the immanence of God in all things and the idea of a universal soul in some Sufi doctrines, and that for Sufis who believe in such things, "the course of metempsychosis is of no consequence".[86]

The Sufi poet Jalaluddin Rumi wrote verse that played on such themes: Template:Blockquote

The 9th-century Iranian mystic Bayazid Bostami is alleged to have imported certain concepts from Hindusim into his version of Sufism under the conceptual umbrella of baqaa, meaning perfection.[87] Ibn al-Arabi and Mansur al-Hallaj both referred to Muhammad as having attained perfection and titled him as Al-Insān al-Kāmil.[88][89][90][91][92][93] The Sufism concept of hulul has similarly been compared with the idea of Ishvaratva, that God dwells in some creatures in Hinduism and Buddhism, and godhood of Jesus in Christianity.[94]

Ziaur Rahman Azmi, a follower Salafi movement, says that the reason behind Hindus' negative perception of Islam is mostly the spread of Sufism in India, as he believes Sufism "distorts" the Islamic ideas of prophethood and Monotheism. He claims Sufism includes idolatry, pointing to Sufi mausoleums and the practices of Tawaf and Sajdah that occur at them.[95]

Differences[edit | edit source]

Foods[edit | edit source]

Islam has restrictions on food, such as how meat is prepared.[96] Halal meat is prepared by ritual slaughter that involves cutting the jugular veins of an animal with a sharp knife. This leads to death via bleeding.[97] Meat from animals that die of natural causes or by accident is not allowed.

In Hinduism, food habits are left as a choice for Hindus, and both meat and alcohol consumption is accepted. However, some Hindu communities prefer vegetarianism or lacto-vegetarianism due to their belief in ahimsa or non-violence.[98] There are varied opinions regarding the permissibility of eating meat in Hinduism, depending upon the interpretation of the Hindu scriptures. Some Hindu sects emphasize vegetarianism. Some Hindus avoid eating cow-based beef, but they may eat water buffalo-based beef or pork as an alternative.[99]

Slaughtering a cow is considered to be a religious taboo by Hindus, who consider the cow to be a sacred animal.

Circumcision[edit | edit source]

Khitan, the religious rite of circumcision, is considered obligatory or recommendable for male Muslims.[100] The Qur'an does not mention circumcision explicitly in any verse, but it is noted in the Hadiths of Islam. Circumcision is not compulsory in Islam, but is an important ritual aimed at improving cleanliness. It is strongly encouraged but not enforced.[101]

Circumcision is not a religious requirement in Hinduism. Hinduism discourages non-medical circumcision, as, according to them, the body is made by the almighty God, and nobody has the right to alter it.[102]

Caste and creed[edit | edit source]

Template:Main Hindu cultural (non-religious) texts such as the Manusmriti classify people through stratification and class, i.e. Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, Shudras and allows fluidity and movement of people from one caste to another depending on their profession and what they choose as their “dharma” which literally translates to duty or purpose.[103] The Hindu caste system has been described as four Varnas or as thousands of endogamous hereditary groups called jātis.[103][104][105][106][107]

Islam requires egalitarianism and is against discrimination based on caste, creed or race[108][109][110] Islamic texts do not segregate Muslims. Hadīth, however, mentions the prophecy of the Muslim Ummah being separated into 73 sects based on practices of Islam, not class. However there remain huge discrimination between Shia and Sunni . Also Ahmaddiya has been persecuted severely. There are differences in practices within Muslim communities as traditions differ according to geography, but spiritually all Muslims are equal.[111][112][113]

Consanguineous marriage[edit | edit source]

Consanguineous marriages are those where the bride and groom share a grandparent or near ancestor.[114] Islam prohibits marriage due to consanguinity with ancestors, descendants, siblings, siblings of ancestors and descendants of siblings.[115] However, marriage with first-cousins (3rd degree consanguinity) and farther removed consanguineous relatives is allowed. Hinduism forbids consanguineous marriage of parallel cousins, and strongly recommends seven degrees of biological separation between bride and groom.[116] However, for many communities in South India, especially in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, it is common for Hindu cross cousins to marry, with matrilateral cross cousin (mother's brother's daughter) marriages being especially favored. In the region, "uncle-niece and first-cousin unions are preferential and jointly account for some 30% of marriages." These practices are particularly followed in landed communities such as the Vellalars, who wish to keep wealth within the family. Also, unlike North India, this practice is also common in Brahmins in the region. Arranged endogamous consanguineous marriages are common in Pakistan for economic, religious and cultural reasons.[117]

Jizya[edit | edit source]

Islamic scriptures compel the payment of a special tax called Jizya from dhimmi, who are not liable to pay Zaka'at, the non-Muslims who live in a Muslim state.[118][119] Historically, the jizya tax has been understood in Islam as a fee for protection provided by the Muslim ruler to non-Muslims, for the exemption from military service for non-Muslims, for the permission to practice a non-Muslim faith with communal autonomy in a Muslim state.[120][121]Script error: No such module "Footnotes". If anyone could not afford this tax, they would not have to pay anything.[122] There is no jizya tax upon women, children, elders as well as the poor and the ill.[123] Also those who joined the military service were also not liable to pay the tax.[124]

Islamic stipulation that Muslims must "do battle to guard" the dhimmis and "put no burden on them greater than they can bear" remained a cornerstone of Islamic policy.[125][126]

There is no such concept of "Jizya" in Hindu texts.Template:Citation needed

Slavery[edit | edit source]

Muslim and Hindus societies have practiced slavery many times in history

The practice of slavery in early and late Vedic era of Hinduism is documented. However, some Hindu texts use the term dasa. Some scholars translate this as slave,[127] while other scholars have translated it as servant and religious devotee.[128][129] Arthashastra text of Hinduism dedicates a chapter to dasa where a financially bankrupt individual may become a servant of another. Arthashastra grants a dasa legal rights, and declares abusing, hurting and raping a dasa as a crime.[127][130]

Islam's approach to slavery added the idea that freedom was the natural state of affairs for human beings and in line with this it limited the opportunities to enslave people, commended the freeing of slaves and regulated the way slaves were treated:

  • Islam greatly limited those who could be enslaved and under what circumstances (although these restrictions were often evaded)
  • Islam treated slaves as human beings as well as property
  • Islam banned the mistreatment of slaves – indeed the tradition repeatedly stresses the importance of treating slaves with kindness and compassion
  • Islam allowed slaves to achieve their freedom and made freeing slaves a virtuous act
  • Islam barred Muslims from enslaving other Muslims

The Quran and the Hadiths strongly discourage the institution of slaves.[131][132] Islam, in many cases, encouraged freeing of slave act of benevolence, and expiation of sins. Islam only allows slavery through certain means and many Islamic scholars claim Islam blocked many ways through which people used to own slaves.[133][134] Most interpretations of the Quran agree that the Quran envisions an ideal society as one in which slavery no longer exists.[135][136][137][138]

Blasphemy[edit | edit source]

Template:Main Blasphemy against God and against Muhammad is a religious crime in Islam.[139] The Quran in verse and many Hadiths discuss blasphemy and its punishment.[139] A variety of actions, speeches, or behavior can constitute blasphemy in Islam.[140] Some examples include insulting or cursing Allah or the Prophets or drawing offensive cartoons, tearing or burning holy literature of Islam, and creating or using music, painting, video, or novels to mock or criticize prophet Muhammad are some examples of blasphemous acts. Punishment can range from imprisonment or flogging to execution.[140][141]

Although the concept of "divine blasphemy" or "heresy" does not exist in Hinduism, and ancient Hindu texts make no provisions for blasphemy.[142][143][144] According to 2018 annual report of U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, there has been Hindu nationalist groups through their campaign to "Saffronize" India through violence, intimidation, and harassment against non-Hindus and according to the data, approximately one-third of state governments enforced anti-conversion and/or anti-cow slaughter laws against non-Hindus.[145][146]

Apostasy[edit | edit source]

Template:Main Apostasy, defined in Islam as the conscious act by a Muslim of leaving Islam or blaspheming against it, is a religious crime according to some Islamic schools of law.[147][148][149]

Hinduism does not have a "unified system of belief encoded in a declaration of faith or a creed" and is thus more tolerant to apostasy.[28][30] Some Hindu sects believe that ethical conversion, without force or reward, is completely acceptable.[150] However, the Vashistha Dharmasastra, the Apastamba Dharmasutra, and Yajnavalkya state that a son of an apostate is also considered an apostate.[151] Smr̥ticandrikā lists apostates as a group of people upon touching whom, one should take a bath.[152] Nāradasmṛti and Parasara-samhita state that a wife can remarry if her husband becomes an apostate.[153] The Saint Parashara commented that religious rites are disturbed if an apostate witnesses them.[154] He also comments that those who forgo the Rig Veda, Samaveda, and Yajurveda are "nagna" (naked) or an apostate.[155]

Both religions state that there should be no compulsion in religion.[156][157]

Notable views[edit | edit source]

By Muslims[edit | edit source]

The cover of the 1910 english translated edition of Kitab al-Hind, which was originally the first detailed Muslim work on Indology and Hinduism.

Among classical Muslim works on Indology, Alberuni in his book Kitab al-Hind (Template:Lang-ar, Template:Transliteration, meaning: A Critical Study of Indian Doctrines, Whether Rationally Acceptable or Not), first gave the detailed description about Indian religious histories and beliefs along with the relation of Sufism with it. Al-Masudi also wrote about Indology and the root creeds and customs of Hinduism in his book Murūj aḏ-Ḏahab wa-Maʿādin al-Jawhar. Ibn Khaldun also dicussed on Indology in his two books Muqaddimah and Kitab al-ibar as well as Ibn al-Athir in his book Al-Kāmil fit-Tārīkh.

Abu Bakar Muhammad Zakaria in his book "Hindusiat wa Tasur" said that, ancient Dravidian Indians were the decendant of Ham, one of the sons of Noah, and the Aryans were the decendants of Japheth, another of the three remained sons of Noah after Biblical great flood,


Ziaur Rahman Azmi in his book "Fusulun fi Adianil Hindi, al-Hindusiatu, Wal Buziatu, Wal Zainiatu, Was Sikhiatu and Alakatut Tasawwfi Biha" (Surveys of Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism as well as Indian Religions and their relationship with Sufism Relation') said that, Hamite Kol race came from Southeast Asia, lived in Mohenjodaro in India in the third century BC, the Turanians came and defeated them and mixed with them, the Dravid race arose, who Mohenjodaro in Sindh. They settled in the Harappan city and then spread into South India, and they divided into four groups according to their language, Kannada, Malayam, Tamil and Telugu.[158] During this time they continued to clash with the Aryans from the east of the Indus for several centuries, and the name Hindu was given by the Greeks and Iranians to this Indus (Sindh) word. The inhabitants accepted their allegiance and then the Aryans began to mold the social system and the inhabitants of India entered the Vedic society. Azmi cites archaeological similarities as well as linguistic similarities between Sanskrit and Persian, suggesting that the Aryans were of European Persian origin, and he cites linguistics to suggest that the Sanskrit-speaking Aryans and the Persian-speaking were inhabitants of the same territory, and that they came from Persia.[158] At one point when the Aryans won, the local inhabitants including the Dravidians accepted their allegiance, then the Aryans began to shape the social system and the inhabitants of India entered the Vedic society. Azmi cites archaeological similarities as well as linguistic similarities between Sanskrit and Persian, suggesting that the Aryans were of European Persian origin, and he cites linguistics to suggest that the Sanskrit-speaking Aryans and the Persian-speaking were inhabitants of the same territory, and that they came from Persia.[158]The Aryans then divided the natives of India into four classes (caste system) in order of status, these being Brahmins (Arya priests or clerics), Kshatriyas (Rajput warriors or Marathas), Vaishya (Turani Dravidian traders or traders and farmers) and Shudra (Turani Dravidian laborers or labourers), the first two being the Aryan upper caste and the latter two the Dravidian lower caste. According to Azmi, among them, the Shudras were persecuted and disrespected by the Aryans, and in the 20th century they converted en masse, and a large number of people converted to Islam, especially the Dalit communities in various places, including Tamil Nadu, whose voluntary conversion to Islam was received coverage from the Indian press , whuch Azmi cites numerous sources with quotations including of Babasaheb Ambedkar.[158] Hindus then concentrated on writing texts which were divided into five eras. respectively:[95]

  1. The four Vedas were composed in the first age. According to Azmi, Vedic culture was the product of a mixture of Aryan and local Dravidian cultures. Besides, he rejects the conventional idea of ​​claiming the Vedas as an Abrahamic sahifah book with his own arguments.[158]
  2. In the second period Hindu philosophers composed the Upanishads, incorporating the basic concepts of Sufism or Tasawwuf, associated with al-Hallaj, Ibn Arabi and Sarmad Kashani, who Nirvana and composed Wahdat al-Wujud in association with Om, also Ibn Habit, Ahmad Ibn Namus, Abu Muslim Khorasani and Muhammad Ibn Zakariya Raji propagated the concept of reincarnation of Hinduism in the name of Islam.[158] Also at this time, an Upanishad called Allopanishad was written during the reign of the Emperor of India Jalal Uddin Akbar, where the concept of God in Islam is discussed.
  3. Compendium of religious practices was prepared in the third period. Smriti books were written during this time, among which Manusmriti is the most notable.
  4. The Aryan gods started disappearing due to the fusion of the Aryans with the inhabitants of India during the fourth period. The Aryas worshiped Indra as the god of thunder, Agni as the god of fire, Aruna as the god of the sky and Usha as the god of the morning. But later Vishnu as the god of sustenance and Shiva as the god of destruction took their place and the Puranas were written praising these gods. At various places in the books, the story of creation, resurrection and the time between the two Manus and the time between the two destructions of the universe are given. According to Hindu belief this universe is imperishable. It is destroyed and created anew many times. Azmi also claims that, since the Aryan migration took place through Egypt and Syria during the time of the Christian Saint Paul, the Aryans were later influenced by the Christian trinitarianism developed by Saint Paul to develop a trinitarian divine concept consisting of Vishnu, Brahma and Mahadeva (Shiva).[158]
  5. In the fifth age, the Mahabharata, the Gita and the Ramayana were composed, which contain accounts of the battles of the Aryan leaders and their victories in war.[95]

In addition, Hindu scriptures are said to contain descriptions of various Islamic prophecies, including the arrival of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, which Muhammad Ibrahim Mir Sialkoti and Sanaullah Amritsari and many others described in their books the 20th century.[158]. Azmi said, although the Hindu scriptures are not, according to the consensus of Muslims, the Asmani Kitabs (heavenly books), there may be three possible explanations for the inclusion of these Islam-related prophecies in Hinduism,, the first is that, the religion of the Prophet Abraham appeared in Iraq during the period of the Aryans' exodus or migration, when the Aryans left their homeland, perhaps during his time, any other prohet came to India, at whose command these prophecies were incorporated, or the Aryans passing through the region took them from the Torah and the Book of Abraham,[158] or, many Hindus say, the Rigveda was copied from the Torah, another view is that the Hindus copied their texts. During revision, they were inserted to please Muslim rulers during Islamic rule, according to Sultan Mubin, professor of Sanskrit at Shibli College, they are fabrications and later additions by Hindus, incorporated by Hindus to please Muslim rulers under Muslim rule,[158] such as the Kalki Purana and the Bhavishya Purana, in which, there are many prophecies in Islamic affairs. Azmi argues, most of the scriptures of Hindus were translated into Arabic in Bayt al-Hikmah during the reign of Caliph Mamub bin Al-Rashid, but no author of that time mentioned anything about these prophecies in any of their books. For example, Alberuni's India ("Tahqiq ma lilhind min maqulat mayqulat fi aliakal au marjula", تحقيق ما للهند من مقولة مقولة في العقل و مرذولة) and his Arabic translations of two other hindu scriptures, neither of which mentions these prophecies. Azmi claims more support for the latter view.[158][95][159]

Azmi says about the religion of Hinduism,


Azmi says that the reason behind Hindus' negative perception of Islam is, {{quote|In my view, Hindus do not understand the reality of Risalat and the essence of Tawheed, the main reason for their conflict and hatred with Muslims. For, those among Muslims who have pursued Hinduism-influenced Sufism have distorted the correct creeds of Islam — the creeds cherished by the Sahaba and the Tabees in the light of the Qur'an and Sunnah. And Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who struggled to establish this Aqeedah (creed) and Shaikhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah followed his path and the Imams of Ahlus Sunnat Wal Jamaat followed him. Furthermore, these Sufis mixed Islamic Aqeedah with Idolatry beliefs. The great proof of this is the mausoleums built on many graves across India and the Kufr (anti-monotheistic) activities like Tawaf, Sijdah and prayers for help are performed around them. These works are mainly done by Hindus around their temple. Apart from this, lies and propaganda by Hindu writers about Islam and Islamic religion are equally responsible for this. They have spread massive lies about our history and the life of Rasool ﷺ. A primary student of Hindu scriptures begins his studies with a negative view of Islam and Muslims. That's why, for the Muslims of India, efforts should be made to extensively translate their religious texts into local languages. On the other hand, Muslims ruled India for about eight centuries. But there were generally not many rulers among them, except those specially favored by Allah, who took any initiative to spread the light of Islam among the Hindu masses under them. Rather, the situation became more dangerous when Hindu scriptures like the Vedas, Gita and Ramayana were translated into Arabic and Persian at their initiative; Where they have shown indifference towards the translation of Quran, Hadith, Sirat and original and pure books containing details of Islamic religion into other local languages ​​including Sanskrit. Even till today no reliable pure translation of Quran has been written in Hindi language.[158] I have read some Hindi translations of the Quran in some libraries, which have not been translated with such precision. So these should be re-examined. It would be best to have it translated anew under the supervision of an alim well-known in the field of Aqeedah and Self-Purification.[158][95]

Ahmadiyya scholar Abdul Haq Vidyarthi referred Muhammad as Kalki of Hinduism in many of his books. Also Muhammad Ibrahim Mir Sialkoti and Sanaullah Amritsari wrote book on the same topic.

By Hindus[edit | edit source]

The founder of Arya Samaj, Dayanand Saraswati criticised Islam and Quran in his book Satyarth Prakash and raised 114 questions against the Quran. Another book by a member of Arya Samaj was also written in 19th century in criticism of Muhammad named Rangila Rasul, which caused huge stir in Hindu-Muslim community of India, with casualties. Both books was later responsed by Sanaullah Amritsari.

A few Hindu scholars like Ved Prakash Upaddhay[79][80] also argue that mentions of Kalki refer to Muhammad in some Hindu scriptures.[80][160] Sri Sri Ravi Shankar claimed in his book "Hinduism and Islam: The Common Thread" that Muhammad is explicitly prophesied in Bhavishya Purana.[161][162]

Radheshyam Brahmachari in his book "Islamic Theology: It's Time to Go Home" called the Muslims of India as forced converts and urged them to return to Hinduism as their original religion.[163]


In popular culture[edit | edit source]

Music[edit | edit source]

Template:Further There have been instances of syncretic cooperation on music with Islamic and Hindu themes. For example, the national poet of Bangladesh, Kazi Nazrul Islam, wrote many Islamic devotional songs for mainstream Bengali folk music.[164] He also explored Hindu devotional music by composing Shyama Sangeet, Durga Vandana, Sarswati Vandana, bhajans and kirtans, often merging Islamic and Hindu values. Nazrul's poetry and songs explored the philosophy of Islam and Hinduism.[165]

See also[edit | edit source]

Template:Portal

Template:Clear

References[edit | edit source]

Template:Reflist

Bibliography[edit | edit source]

Template:Wikiquote

Relations
Islam in South Asia
Communal violence
General

Template:Hindudharma Template:Islam topicsTemplate:Authority control

  1. Template:Cite encyclopedia
  2. 2.0 2.1 Template:Cite web
  3. Template:Harvnb
  4. Template:Harvnb
  5. Template:Cite web
  6. Template:Cite web
  7. Template:Cite web
  8. Template:Cite journal
  9. Template:Cite book
  10. Template:Cite web
  11. Template:Citation
  12. Template:Cite journal
  13. Template:Cite web
  14. Template:Cite journal
  15. Template:Cite news
  16. 16.0 16.1 Template:Cite encyclopedia
  17. Template:Cite book
  18. Template:Cite web
  19. Template:Cite journal
  20. Hassan, Ahmad Y. 1996. "Factors Behind the Decline of Islamic Science After the Sixteenth Century." Pp. 351–99 in Islam and the Challenge of Modernity, edited by S. S. Al-Attas. Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015.
  21. Template:Cite web
  22. 22.0 22.1 Burton-Page, J., “Hindū”, in: Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition, Edited by: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W.P. Heinrichs. Consulted online on 12 December 2023 Template:Doi First published online: 2012 First print edition: Template:ISBN, 1960–2007
  23. 23.0 23.1 Rahman, F., “Barāhima”, in: Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition, Edited by: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W.P. Heinrichs. Consulted online on 12 December 2023 Template:Doi First published online: 2012 First print edition: Template:ISBN, 1960–2007
  24. Template:Cite book
  25. Template:Cite encyclopedia
  26. Template:Cite book
  27. 27.0 27.1 Template:Cite encyclopedia
  28. 28.0 28.1 28.2 Template:Cite book
  29. Lester Kurtz (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace and Conflict, Template:ISBN, Academic Press, 2008
  30. 30.0 30.1 MK Gandhi, The Essence of Hinduism, Editor: VB Kher, Navajivan Publishing, see page 3; According to Gandhi, "a man may not believe in God and still call himself a Hindu."
  31. Template:Cite book
  32. Template:Cite encyclopedia
  33. 33.0 33.1 Template:Cite encyclopedia
  34. Template:Cite encyclopedia
  35. 35.0 35.1 35.2 Template:Cite encyclopedia
  36. Template:Cite web
  37. Template:Cite encyclopedia
  38. Template:Cite book
  39. David Leeming The Oxford Companion to World Mythology Oxford University Press 2005 ISBN 978-0-195-15669-0 page 209
  40. Template:Cite book
  41. N Mohammad sahab (1985), The doctrine of jihad: An introduction, Journal of Law and Religion, 3(2): 381–397
  42. Template:Cite book
  43. Narain, Harsh. Jizyah and the Spread of Islam. Voice of India, 1990.
  44. Futuhat-i Firoz Shahi Autobiography of Firoz Shah Tughlaq, Translated y Elliot and Dawson, Volume 3 - The History of India, Cornell University, pp 374–83
  45. 45.0 45.1 45.2 45.3 Friedmann, Yohanan. "Medieval Muslim views of Indian religions." Journal of the American Oriental Society (1975): 214-221.
  46. The Devil's Deception (Talbis Iblis) By Imam Ibn Al-Jawzi Dar as-Sunnah Publishers
  47. Bahuguna, Rameshwar Prasad. "The Ideological–Political Role Of Brahmans In Later Medieval India." Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. Vol. 72. Indian History Congress, 2011.
  48. Elias, J. J. (2014). Key Themes for the Study of Islam. Vereinigtes Königreich: Oneworld Publications
  49. Zadeh, Travis. "Commanding demons and jinn: The sorcerer in early Islamic thought." No Tapping around Philology: A Festschrift in Honor of Wheeler McIntosh Thackston Jr.’s 70th Birthday (2014): 149.
  50. Abedinifard, Mostafa; Azadibougar, Omid; Vafa, Amirhossein, eds. (2021). Persian Literature as World Literature. Literatures as World Literature. USA: Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 40–43. ISBN 978-1501354205, ISBN 9781501354205
  51. Template:Cite journal
  52. Irani, Ayesha A. The Muhammad Avat= ara: Salvation History, Translation, and the Making of Bengali Islam. Oxford University Press, 2020.
  53. Neal Robinson (2013), Islam: A Concise Introduction, Routledge, Template:ISBN, Chapter 7
  54. Template:Cite book
  55. Template:Cite book
  56. Template:Cite encyclopedia
  57. Template:Cite book
  58. Template:Cite book
  59. Template:Cite book
  60. Oliver Leaman The Biographical Encyclopedia of Islamic Philosophy Bloomsbury Publishing 2015 Template:ISBN page 311
  61. Template:Cite book
  62. Template:Cite book
  63. Firoz-Ul Haque Islam Under the Microscope: A Condensed Digest for Muslims and Non-Muslims Atlantic Publishers & Dist 2006 Template:ISBN page 35
  64. Don Handelman (2013), One God, Two Goddesses, Three Studies of South Indian Cosmology, Brill Academic, Template:ISBN, pages 23-29
  65. Wendy Doniger (1988), Textual Sources for the Study of Hinduism, Manchester University Press, Template:ISBN, page 67
  66. Wash Edward Hale (1999), Ásura in Early Vedic Religion, Motilal Barnarsidass, Template:ISBN, pages 2–6
  67. Template:Cite book
  68. Mohammed Yamin Impact of Islam on Orissan Culture Readworthy Template:ISBN page 56–57
  69. Jean Holm, John Bowker Sacred Place Bloomsbury Publishing 2001 Template:ISBN page 112
  70. 70.0 70.1 Clinton Bennett, Charles M. Ramsey South Asian Sufis: Devotion, Deviation, and Destiny A&C Black Template:ISBN page 23
  71. Template:Cite book
  72. World Faiths, teach yourself – Islam by Ruqaiyyah Maqsood. Template:ISBN page 76
  73. Template:Cite web
  74. Template:Cite news
  75. Template:Cite book
  76. Template:Cite book
  77. Template:Cite web
  78. Template:Cite web
  79. 79.0 79.1 Template:Cite web
  80. 80.0 80.1 80.2 80.3 Template:Cite web
  81. Template:Cite book
  82. Template:Cite book
  83. Template:Cite news
  84. Malika Mohammada The Foundations of the Composite Culture in India Aakar Books 2007 Template:ISBN page 141
  85. Template:Cite book
  86. Template:Cite book
  87. Template:Cite book
  88. Template:Cite book
  89. Template:Cite book
  90. Template:Cite book
  91. Template:Cite book
  92. Template:Cite book
  93. Template:Cite book
  94. Template:Cite book
  95. 95.0 95.1 95.2 95.3 95.4 Template:Cite book
  96. Qurʾan 2:173
  97. Template:Cite book
  98. Template:Cite web
  99. Template:Cite book
  100. Template:Cite encyclopedia
  101. Template:Cite web
  102. Template:Cite journal
  103. 103.0 103.1 Template:Cite journal
  104. Template:Cite book
  105. Template:Cite book
  106. Dereserve these myths Template:Webarchive by Tanweer Fazal,Indian express
  107. Template:Cite book
  108. Template:Cite web
  109. Template:Cite web
  110. Template:Cite web
  111. Template:Cite book
  112. Template:Cite book
  113. Template:Cite book
  114. Joseph, S. E. (2007), Kissing Cousins, Current Anthropology, 48(5), pages 756–764
  115. Template:Cite book
  116. Template:Cite book
  117. Template:Cite journal
  118. John Louis Esposito, Islam the Straight Path, Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 33–34
  119. Anver M. Emon, Religious Pluralism and Islamic Law: Dhimmis and Others in the Empire of Law, Oxford University Press, Template:ISBN, pp. 99–109
  120. Anver M. Emon (26 July 2012). "Religious Pluralism and Islamic Law: Dhimmis and Others in the Empire of Law." Oxford University Press. pp. 99–109. ISBN 978-0199661633.
  121. Template:Cite book (online) Non-Muslims Paying Jizyah In a State of Humiliation by Bassam Zawadi https://www.call-to-monotheism.com/non_muslims_paying_jizyah_in_a_state_of_humiliation
  122. Template:Cite journal
  123. al-Qāḍī Abū Yaʿlā, al-Aḥkām al-Sulṭāniyyah, p. 160. Quote: «وتسقط الجزية عن الفقير وعن الشيخ وعن الزَمِن [أي صاحب العاهة]» Translation: "There is no jizya upon the poor, the old, and the chronically ill."
  124. Mapel, D.R. and Nardin, T., eds. (1999), International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives, p. 231. Princeton University Press. Template:ISBN. Quote: "Jizya was levied upon dhimmis in compensation for their exemption from military service in the Muslim forces. If dhimmis joined Muslims in their mutual defense against an outside aggressor, the jizya was not levied."
  125. Template:Cite book
  126. Template:Cite webTauris Academic Studies. ISBN 9781845113537.
  127. 127.0 127.1 Shamasastry, Arthashastra of Chanakya, pp. 260–264
  128. A Sharma (September 2005), Journal American Acad Religion, 73(3): 843–870
  129. Kangle R.P. (1960), The Kautiliya Arthasastra – a critical edition, Part 3, University of Bombay Studies, Template:ISBN, p. 186
  130. B. Breloer (1934), Kautiliya Studien, Bd. III, Leipzig, pages 10–16, 30–71
  131. Template:Cite book
  132. Template:Cite web
  133. Template:Cite book
  134. Abbott, N. (1942). "Women and the state in early Islam". Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 1(3), pp. 341–368
  135. (Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref)
  136. Template:Cite book
  137. (Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref)
  138. Template:Cite book
  139. 139.0 139.1 Template:Cite book
  140. 140.0 140.1 Template:Cite book
  141. Template:Cite book
  142. Template:Cite book
  143. Template:Cite book
  144. Template:Cite book
  145. Template:Cite report
  146. Template:Cite web
  147. Template:Citation
  148. Template:Citation
  149. Template:Citation
  150. Template:Cite web
  151. Template:Cite book
  152. Template:Cite book
  153. Template:Cite book
  154. Template:Cite book
  155. Template:Cite book
  156. Template:Cite web
  157. Jacques Berque (1995), Le Coran : Essai de traduction, p.63, note v.256, éditions Albin Michel, Paris.
  158. 158.00 158.01 158.02 158.03 158.04 158.05 158.06 158.07 158.08 158.09 158.10 158.11 158.12 Template:Cite book
  159. Template:Cite journal
  160. Template:Cite book
  161. Template:Cite book
  162. Template:Cite news
  163. Template:Cite book
  164. Kamrunnessa Azad. 2001. Dharmiya Chetonay Nazrul. Nazrul Institute, Dhaka. 1999. pp. 173–174
  165. Kamrunnessa Azad. 2001. Dharmiya Chetonay Nazrul. Nazrul Institute, Dhaka. 1999. pp. 19–20